Skip to main content

tv   Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer  CNN  January 31, 2017 2:00pm-3:01pm PST

2:00 pm
enrolled in the federal and state exchanges. that is up from this time last year. that it for "the lead." i'm jake tapper. i'll be back for president trump's supreme court pick. nancy pelosi. turn ing it over to wolf blitzer in the "the situation room." >> happening now, breaking news. the president's pick, president trump will reveal his supreme court nominee three hours from now at a primetime announcement. he's called his top two finalists to washington like a high stakes version of apprentice. who will be his pick? chaos and confusion, trump tells his acting attorney general, you're fired, after she questions the legality of his travel ban from mostly muslim nations. the white house insists it's not a ban, but that's the word used by both the president and his press secretary. uphill fight, every democrat is digging their heels in the confirmation of the attorney general nominee and they've boycotted committee votes for other presidential picks.
2:01 pm
can they stage a battle over the supreme court nominee? do they have any room left to maneuver? and trump's brain, his white house strategist steve bannon, the former boss of a right wing website, the most influential voice in the president's ear. has he put a stamp on the controversial early moves? i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> we're following multiple news stories under fire from all sides. the white house is defending its temporary ban on travel from seven mostly muslim nations including an indefinite haul to refugees entering the united states from syria. president trump's order has brought chaos and condemnation when the acting attorney general publicly questioned its legality and the president promptly fired her. homeland security secretary john kelly denies that he was kept in
2:02 pm
the dark when the order was drawn up and stresses it's not a ban on muslims. white house press secretary sean spicer takes exception to using the word ban altogether, except that he used that very word this week as did president trump. furious democrats have been staaling the confirmation of the attorney general nominee. senator jeff sessions and they boycotted committee votes for the treasury and health nominees leading a top republican senator to call the democrats, and i'm quoting now, idiots. just three hours from now, live on cnn, president trump will change the subject completely and set the stage for a potentially bigger batter by revealing his nominee for the u.s. supreme court. he's playing it very close to the vest. sources say his top two picks, both strong conservatives were summoned to washington ahead of the announcement. i'll speak with democratic congressman seth molten, and our correspondents, analysts and guests are standing by with full coverage of today's top stories. caught up in a battle over the
2:03 pm
president's order suspending travel from seven mostly muslim nations, the trump administration is ready to move on to the next fight. let's begin with our senior white house correspondent jim accosta. jim, is the white house looking to change the subject? >> they are trying, wolf. the president is standing firm that this executive order that established extreme vetting is not a ban, but that is a word that the president has used himself more than once. but you're right, the white house is trying to change the subject as they engage in this baltimore over semantics and he'll try to do that later on tonight when he announces his pick for the supreme court. across the trump administration, all of a sudden there seems to be a ban on the word "ban" >> that is not a travel ban. this is not, i repeat, not a ban on muslims. >> new homeland security secretary john kelly insisted the executive order barring travelers from seven predominantly muslim countries does not amount to a ban. >> first of all, it's not a travel ban. >> but tell that to the
2:04 pm
president who treated just yesterday, if the ban were announced with a one week notice the bad would rush into our country during that week. a lot of bad dudes out there. he said this saturday. >> you see it in the airports, it's working out very nicely and we're going to have a very, very strict ban and we're going to have extreme vetting which we should have had in this country for many years. >> white house press secretary sean spicer tried to explain it this way. >> he's using the words that the media is using. at the end of the day, it can't -- hold on. it can't be -- it can't be -- johnathan, thanks, i'll let kristen talk. >> even though spicer used the word ban himself on sunday. >> it's a 90-day ban. >> then there is what one of the top surrogates rudy giuliani told fox over the weekend. >> when he first announced it, he said muslim ban. he called me up, he said, put a commission together. show me the right way to do it legally. and what we did was we focused on instead of religion, danger. >> spicer's answer for that.
2:05 pm
>> then you should ask mayor giuliani. that's his opinion. >> the administration is still pushing back on the notion it botched the roll out of the executive order which led to chaos at airports across the country. >> we knew it was coming, it wasn't a surprise if was coming and we implemented it. >> house speaker paul ryan carefully criticized the execution of the order but not the policy itself. >> i think it's regrettable that there was some confusion on the roll out of this. no one wanted to see people with green cards or special immigrant visas like translators get caught up not in all this. >> the white house is standing by the firing of sally yates who fought -- at her own hearing two years ago, yates told alabama senator and now attorney general nominee jeff sessions she was capable of telling the president no. >> you think the attorney general has a responsibility to say no to the president if he asks for something that's
2:06 pm
improper? >> senator, i believe that the attorney general or the deputy attorney general has an obligation to follow the law and the constitution and to give their independent legal advice to the president. >> now, the white house will try to turn the page later on tonight at 8:00 eastern when the president is scheduled to announce his pick for the supreme court. aides here at the white house are confident they'll have enough democrats on the other side of the aisle to put this nominee over the top, wolf. but given all the anger on the other end of pennsylvania avenue in the democratic party right now, that might be easier said than done, wolf. >> jim accosta, thank you very much. president trump will reveal the supreme court nominee as we heard in a primetime announcement. you can watch it live right here on cnn 8:00 p.m. eastern. meantime, sources say the president has summoned his two finalists to washington. let's bring in our supreme court correspondent pamela brown. so, does one of them, pamela, have an edge? >> there are increasing indications, wolf, that judge neil gorsuch has an edge at this point. but as we have been saying all
2:07 pm
day long, sources caution us that donald trump could still change his mind. as we pointed out this morning the other top finalist we've been reporting on was on his way here to washington, d.c. summoned by the white house. we are told by our sources, would have, that neil gorsuch did receive a call from the white house saying that he is likely the pick, but again anything can happen. he arrived here in washington last night. judge hardiman, the other contender i pointed out driving here this morning w. to wait and see what happens a few hours from now. >> why did the white house decide to bring both of them to washington if only one is going to get the job? >> that's a good question. i'm told by sources familiar with this process that the white house is taking extraordinary measures to protect this process and to conceal who the topic is and part of that strategy ask to bring both of them to washington, would have. and also there is still the possibility, if you will, that donald trump could have a change of heart. he's been going back and forth between these two judges. as we point out, the leading contender has been judge gorsuch, but they want to have
2:08 pm
judge hardiman in washington as well. >> the drama continues. >> suspense for sure. >> thank you for joining us. seth molten, served four tours of duty in iraq as a u.s. marine corps infantry officer. congressman, thanks very much for joining us. >> good to be back, wolf. >> let's talk about some of these issues. the president fired the acting attorney general sally yates last night after she said she would refuse to defend his executive order in court. was it appropriate for her to make that call? >> absolutely. i mean, her job is to make her best legal judgment. she's a career prosecutor. she was approved by an overwhelming bipartisan majority of the senate. her job is to uphold the law and to follow the constitution. that's what she did when she made this decision. >> would it have been more appropriate for her to simply offer her resignation? >> that's her decision. i wouldn't say whether it's appropriate or not. i think the most important thing for her to do is just to uphold
2:09 pm
the law. that's what she did, and unfortunately the president decided to fire her over it. >> what is unconstitutional about the president's order? >> well, first of all, one of the principles in our constitution is that you do not discriminate on the basis of religion. and it's very clear from rudy giuliani's statement and others that that's how this was envisioned. that this is a muslim ban. the white house may not like to use that word. it's obvious why they don't want to use the word, but that is exactly what this policy is all about. and we've seen the incredible chaos that has accompanied its implementation. >> but i guess the point that the white house makes is, yes, this ban involves seven mostly muslim countries, but there are few dozen other muslim countries including saudi arabia and egypt, the largest muslim country, indonesia, for example, that are not affected by this. so, why do you call it a muslim ban? >> look, i call it a muslim ban because that was clearly the policy envisioned by the
2:10 pm
president. when he went on the campaign trail he said this is what he would enact if he were president. there are other muslim countries around the world. there are muslims right here in america. with this policy as ill conceived as it is that is clearly what they're trying to do. obviously someone who believes firmly in the constitution said, we can't even justify this. we can't defend this legally. so, i can't support it from the department of justice. >> the white house press secretary sean spicer yesterday said that federal employees needed, in his words, to get with the program or they can go. critics say the white house is suppressing dissent. the administration says they simply want employees, career officials, for example, at the state department, among others, who should be committed to the president's agenda. what do you think? >> i think they're not only suppressing dissent, they're not even listening to their closest advisors, their cabinet members. you know, i served under general mattis in iraq. i was in his division. and there is no way that he
2:11 pm
supports this ban. in fact, he finally came out today and said that he's going to work on exceptions for all the critical muslim allies, the intelligence sources, the translator that we had to work with every single day in iraq because including them in this ban absolutely harms our national security. so, if the administration put this out without even consulting general mattis in a serious way, then clearly they have no interest in even hearing the ideas of people who support their policy or their administration, let alone people who might dissent with it. >> we did hear from the secretary of homeland security, retired marine corps general john kelly today saying he was informed, he defended the president's decision. we haven't directly yet heard from secretary mattis, also a retired general, if he were to speak out, do you think he would say that this is a good idea? >> no, i don't. but i think that the calculation that a lot of people in the administration are making right
2:12 pm
now is what is the red line for me to resign? i mean, this is something i'm hearing behind the scenes from people at the highest levels all the way down, that they're so dismayed by what trump is doing with bannon and his white supremacist agenda and the oval office that they're all saying at what point do i resign? i think general mattis took this job as secretary of defense because he believes that by being on the inside he can prevent america from truly going off the rails, can prevent a real tragedy that might come from donald trump in the oval office. but he's got to make a tough call at some point as to whether he just continues to support the president, to be in the arena and helping to make those decisions, or whether he just has to resign. i think a lot of people in the administration are having that discussion with themselves and with their friends right now. >> you served under him in iraq, then general now secretary of defense mattis. do you still have faith in him even though he has been silent on this sensitive issue? >> i do. i know general mattis not too well, but i served under him.
2:13 pm
he is a truly moral leader, a great leader in combat, but also someone who stood up firmly against -- when the division was accused of mishandling prisoners, for example. and he always talked about our division motto, which was no better friends, no worsen am i. now, everyone knows what the second part means. you don't want to be an enemy to the united states marines. the first part, the part that comes first is no better friend. that means if you're willing to put your life on the line not just for your country, but for ours, you'll be our best friend. we will protect you from the terrorists who are a common enemy. now with this policy we're just abandoning these critical allies in the fight against terror to the terrorists we're trying to fight. >> because i want to to be precise. you served four tours of duty in iraq. you say it puts our troops' lives at risk. >> absolutely. >> i want you to explain why this policy of the president puts u.s. troops' lives at risk.
2:14 pm
>> when you work in a place pliek iraq or afghlike iraq or afghanistan, you have to rely on intelligence, you go through patrols every single day. you literally put your lives in their hands. if you can't do that, if you can't find people who are willing to work with you, then you're out in the cold and we're not going to be able to find the terrorists and we're not going to be able to protect ourselves. i mean, i worked with a translator on my fourth tour in iraq who worked so closely with my team when we went out with the iraqi security forces that we made sure he got a gun and we trained him and we trusted him with that weapon because we needed him in the fight if we ever got into big trouble. now, he was, of course, targeted by the insurgency for being a collaborator with the americans. and i've worked for the past eight years to get him through the extreme vetting that already exists in the process for refugees from a place like iraq to come here. thank god he was able to get here with his family just a
2:15 pm
couple of months ago before donald trump was inaugurated because if he hadn't gotten here then, he might be stuck in iraq at the hands of the terrorists today. but i want to emphasize, it took eight years, i worked with him in 2008. it took eight years for him to navigate that process. so, when sean spicer gets up there and says we had to do this expeditiously so people wouldn't rush on the planes, it's obvious sean spicer and the administration have no idea how this actually works. >> congressman, we have to take a quick break. there is a lot more to discuss. i'd like you to stand by. we'll resume our conversation right after this. when you're close to the people you love, does psoriasis ever get in the way of a touching moment? if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, you can embrace the chance of completely clear skin with taltz.
2:16 pm
taltz is proven to give you a chance at completely clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of patients had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. in fact, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. do not use if you are allergic to taltz. before starting you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you are being treated for an infection or have symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz. including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. now's your chance at completely clear skin. just ask your doctor about taltz. now's your chance at completely clear skin. which is the best way to get your taxes done? a jackson hewitt tax pro knows you and gets you the maximum refund guaranteed. does the computer? and what does it do if you make a mistake? or the irs sends you a letter? forget the computer. go with a jackson hewitt tax pro.
2:17 pm
2:18 pm
have you any wool?eep, no sir, no sir, some nincompoop stole all my wool sweaters, smart tv and gaming system. luckily, the geico insurance agency recently helped baa baa with renters insurance. everything stolen was replaced. and the hooligan who lives down the lane was caught selling the stolen goods online. visit geico.com and see how easy it is to switch and save on renters insurance. i'm phil mickelson, pro golfer. my psoriatic arthritis caused joint pain. just like my moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. and i was worried about joint damage. my doctor said joint pain from ra... can be a sign of existing joint damage...
2:19 pm
that could only get worse. he prescribed enbrel to help relieve pain and help stop further damage. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders, and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been someplace where fungal infections are common or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for... heart failure, or if you have persistent... fever, bruising, bleeding, or paleness. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. joint pain and damage... can go side by side. ask how enbrel can help relieve joint pain and help stop joint damage. enbrel, the number one rheumatologist-prescribed biologic.
2:20 pm
we're following multiple breaking news stories. the white house under fire for the president's order banning travel from seven mostly muslim nations. the president will change the subject in less than three hours when he reveals his u.s. supreme court pick. we're back with democratic congressman seth molten of massachusetts, member of the armed services committee. once again, he served four tours of duty in iraq as a marine corps infantry officer. congressman, the trump administration points out that president obama back in 2011 took similar action after two iraqi refugees who had been granted asylum living here in the united states were actually found to have constructed road side bombs when they were in iraq, bombs designed to kill american troops. so, how is president trump's order any different today than when president obama did it in 2011 when he put a pause on refugee arrival here in the united states?
2:21 pm
>> it's entirely different, wolf. what president obama did is he simply improved the vetting process. he did not even put a pause on immigration, although the process slowed down because of the additional vetting procedures for people coming from iraq. improvements in the vetting process are something you'll find bipartisan support for here in congress. what trump has done in contrast is just put this blanket ban that will be used against us and our troops. in fact, isis is already using the rhetoric from the trump administration, the text of this executive order to incite attacks against us and recruit more terrorists to their side. >> they point to the they arer threat in europe, whether in france, germany or belgium where isis sympathizers have come in posing as refugees and trump administration officials say they want to prevent that from happening here. how would you address that challenge? >> so, once again, the trump administration is trying to pull
2:22 pm
the wool over the eyes of the american people by comparing two processes that are almost incomparable. when refugees come to the united states, they go through the most comprehensive vetting process of any traveler to america. that's why it took my translator eight years to get here with his family. and this is someone i literally trusted so much i gave him a gun to fight alongside me. in contrast in europe what's happening is with open borders refugees are just fleeing into europe without any proper vetting. so, it's an entirely inappropriate comparison. and europe does have a security problem, but the reason why here in the united states we have not had a single fatal attack from anyone from any of these seven countries in the last 30 years is because our vetting procedures are so strong. >> congressman seth molten of massachusetts, thanks very much for joining us. thanks for your service. >> thanks, wolf. >> coming up, a close look at the man the new york times calls the de facto president, not president trump, but his top political strategist steve bannon.
2:23 pm
so, how powerful is he? erfect c, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates. maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. and if you do have an accident, our claims centers are available to assist you 24/7. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough,
2:24 pm
ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be poible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
2:25 pm
about tempur-pedic mattresses... is that they contour to your body. you just have to lay back in my tempur-pedic, and it just kind of forms to my body. it comes up to you, like, hey, there you are... hey there you are. ...i'm going to put you to sleep now. it keeps us comfortable and asleep at night. can i take a nap now? for a limited time only, save up to $500 on a new tempur-pedic. now through february 26. get your tempur-pedic today! the most highly recommended bed in america.
2:26 pm
2:27 pm
as we await president trump's announcement of his u.s. supreme court nominee, we're also following multiple white house controversies including white house press secretary sean spicer insisting the president's quote, extreme vetting executive order is not a travel ban even though both the president and spicer himself repeatedly have called it a ban. let's bring in our political and legal experts. laura coats, let me start with you. do you think the semantic argument right now over the use of the word "ban" is a symptom some of the confusion that has
2:28 pm
developed over this very sensitive issue over the past few days? >> oh, absolutely. this is the core of the issue people are having. it's the core of what sally yates' confusion was, it's also the core of why there is so much hysteria offer the weekend. you need to have clarity. we were talking about how to have an executive order. it was lacking in this case. it continues as we go forward. regardless who the attorney general is, either acting or seated will have to face the same sort of conundrum hereof how to enforce a law that may or may not contain some elements that are unlawful or untenable to actually enforce. >> a will the of republicans as you know are complaining privately up on capitol hill. they weren't even consulted on this. but we have now learned that some congressional staffers, staff aides who work for members, they were, in fact, part of this process that came up with this idea. so, is that extraordinary, unusual, or is that routine? >> well, it's unusual in that apparently the chairmen, the republican chairman of that
2:29 pm
committee, bob good lat, of the judiciary committee, didn't know that the aides who effectively worked for him on the committee were working on this executive order. he was in the dark, but apparently they weren't. the parts they were charged with. deirdre, a producer up on capitol hill, has been reporting on this and notes that certainly -- you've seen this as well -- when you go to either presidential events or more likely political events, you often see campaign aides on vacation, but working for other people. this is different, though. this is not a political, you know, kind of vacation. this is something where one staff or one branch of the government is helping because they are experts on this, helping draft another's executive order. >> they were assigned to the transition team, to the new white house to help out on this? took a leave from their positions as staffers on the judiciary committee?
2:30 pm
>> it doesn't appear that is the case, at least not according to the chairman, the republican chairman bob good lat's stam. it seems as though they were simply the experts -- the republican experts that were closest to the white house for them to reach out to to help with some of the language. it wasn't as you said the vacation. >> because it is unusual the chairman, members didn't know about it, but the aides, apparently some of them did. ron brownstein, the trump administration also facing criticism for supposedly suppressing dissent within the administration. as you know, the white house press secretary sean spicer said to federal employees, especially those at the state department who are complaining, you should get with the program or go. the acting attorney general, sally yates, was fired, as you know. are they threatening the independence of these career officials, these independent agencies, if you will? >> i think the short answer is yes. i mean, look, if you think about
2:31 pm
the amount of whiplash we are going through, the last time we went from a democratic president to a republican president, we went from a relatively centrist bill clinton to a george w. bush who started off quite centrist himself. the distance, the degree of turn radius was not as jarring. today we're going from an obama presidency that was more liberal than bill clinton's to a trump presidency that is not only more conservative, but more confrontational and more determined to break the crockery in many different directions. i think what we're seeing in the state department with this tug of war over resistance to this executive order is really indicative of a lot of what we are going to see over the next several years. for example, the role of science and climate. some of the further immigration orders that have been floated according to the washington post. you can see a lot of the things they want to do, running into significant resistance within their own government and i think the early signals are they are going to move very aggressively against that in a way that heightens the underlying
2:32 pm
polarization in this administration. >> there will be dissent, and there will be resignations as well. john, you're an expert on the u.s. supreme court, about 2 1/2 hours or so from now we're going to learn who president trump wants to be the next united states supreme court justice. how is all of this controversy that we've seen over the past couple days going to spill over in the questioning of whomever is nominated? >> i think it will spill over and it will spill over right away. as soon as president trump nominates someone, that individual will be brought up to capitol hill for what's called courtesy visits. and usually the senators start testing the waters on issues. i cannot imagine that they won't start asking about this order. and in two ways, first of all, whether it potentially violated any kind of statutory rule with the immigration and naturalization act, and whether there are constitutional issues here. perhaps violations of due process, violations of religious rights. so, i think this is going to be -- it's topic a right now. it will be topic a for much of the supreme court batd l.
2:33 pm
>> everybody stand by. we're just getting word president trump has canceled a planned trip. we'll get details right after a quick break. t
2:34 pm
2:35 pm
2:36 pm
2:37 pm
back-to-back breaking news coming into the situation room. we just learned a trip by president trump is now being called off because of fear of protest. let's get the latest from our cnn white house reporter jeremy diamond on the north lawn of the white house. what are you learning, jeremy? >> hi, wolf.
2:38 pm
yes, an administration official just told me moments ago that president trump was scheduled to go to milwaukee to visit a harley davidson factory on thursday. that trip has now been canceled after harley davidson decide that had it wasn't comfortable hosting the president amid a flurry of protests that have been planned for the president's -- what was supposed to be the president's visit to milwaukee on thursday. the company apparently told trump administration officials that it wasn't necessarily what the president was planning to do there where he was potentially going to sign some executive orders on american manufacturing, but it was really the presence of protests, protests planned because of the president's immigration ban. so, we're seeing the continued effects here snowballing as the president looks to continue to implement his agenda. he's hitting roadblocks once again in part because of this controversial immigration executive order, wolf. >> good reporting, jeremy diamond at the white house. dana, pretty extraordinary, not even two weeks into this
2:39 pm
presidency, already a trip like this would normally have been a routine trip for a new u.s. president to go to wisconsin, meet with harley davidson workers, executives, all of a sudden fear of protests resulting in harley davidson telling the white house not a good time to show up. >> right. you're talking about what was supposed to be the core of the trump message and the trump presidency, which is jobs and jobs in places that he says presidents before and democrats before have forgotten. harley davidson, an american company in the state of wisconsin, which president trump won, first time a republican won there in three decades since 1984, and was going to go talk about manufacturing. and american manufacturing. the fact that the company said, you know what, it's just not going to be a good scene for you, don't come, is the first real world example of how this whole disaster of the travel situation has stepped on what was supposed to be his core message, which is jobs, jobs,
2:40 pm
jobs, getting america working again, and that's it. that is really the reason why people in wisconsin, in michigan voted for donald trump. >> ron, you want to weigh in? >> yeah. i think it goes even deeper than the executive order, although that's certainly the flash point right now. i tweeted the other day asking, would it be possible for donald trump, president trump to go to any major city without experiencing major protests? the core divide that we saw in this election was geographic. hillary clinton won 88 of the 100 largest counties in america. he dominated in smaller midsize cities, and rural areas. but the actions of the presidency in the two weeks have deepened the divides i think that we saw in the election. you know, in gallop poling the other day, he reached 50%, a majority of americans saying they disapproved of him after eight days in office. for president obama, he didn't reach that dubious milestone until about 600 days. for george w. bush it was 1200 days. ronald reagan around 700 days. what we're seeing is an intense
2:41 pm
polarization that is reflected in this decision, but also i think we'll have a real impact on democrats on capitol hill. not so much on president trump or republicans, but democrats in many ways will be scrambling. i think are scrambling to keep up with their own coalition which has shown a visceral reaction against many of the initiatives that the president is pursuing. >> ron, let me just repeat the news for viewers just tuning in. this according to our jeremy diamond, our white house reporter and administration officials, tells him the president will not head to milwaukee for a visit at a harley davidson factory on thursday which had been scheduled. the company deciding it wasn't comfortable hosting the president amid plans of protests in milwaukee. this according to administration official. we've covered new presidents for a while, you and me. have you ever seen anything this early in an administration unfolding like this, protests and controversy, some would call it even chaos as a result of that travel ban executive order?
2:42 pm
>> no. look, there's never been anything like this. first of all, there's never anything like the protests the day after inaugural where americans protested in the streets, and have a repeat performance at airports which are not an easy place to get to around this issue. tens of thousands of people again in the streets. and again, this underlying reality in public opinion, there are a lot of people who are very enthused about the change that donald trump is pursuing, and we continue to see that in stories where people go into the heart of trump country. there is no question that he has stirred a deeper backlash at the outset than any president, i think, in modern teams reflected in both the magnitude and intensity of the underlying reality that in gallop poll he is already a 50 majority disapproval, 8, 9 days into his presidency when it takes years. bill clinton was the shortest ever, 160 days. donald trump got there in eight. >> i just want to add i think ron certainly makes a very good
2:43 pm
point the fact cities tend to be where the anti-trump voters were. but milwaukee has been historically a republican sort of oasis when it comes to cities in wisconsin. i mean, it is where scott walker is from, the suburbs around there, and, you know, and also it's not just that's true politically, but also a company like harley davidson, i'm not saying it's partisan, but i have been to harley davidson factories and so forth in wisconsin with republican after republican. they are used to hosting republican politicians. so, the fact that they even thought this is not a good thing i think is quite telling. >> it is extraordinary, this early in a new administration to see something like this unfold. as you point out, especially on a gut issue which he campaigned on, manufacturing here in the united states. >> manufacturing in the united states, and something as symbolically as american and as american as it gets, which is harley davidson, right?
2:44 pm
>> very quickly, laura, on the two finalists, if you will, on the supreme court nominee, we're going to hear about that 8:00 eastern later tonight. they're both conservatives, but are there major differences? you've studied them? >> one of the major difrss between the two, one is far more prolific on the area of abortion and pro life issues. >> which one? >> that's gorsuch. he's written a book on the sanctity of life. the real issue with those two distinctions is the fact that we have in the past had with justice suitor someone not written on the area of abortion and in fact became one of the biggest disappointments in conservatives and changed and voted in favor of upholding roe v. wade. that lack of information about his views on whether or not he would indeed seek a reversal on roe v. wade is critical issue for someone like donald trump. >> do you see differences between them, joan? >> i do. judge gorsuch in the mold of justice scalia, he has a clear approach to the law that he's written a lot about. he's much more of an
2:45 pm
intellectual thinker. he's much more consistent in what he's done. judge hardiman, i think it's a little bit more of a mixed bag. in terms of case by case approach, but as we've said all day, he will bring something different to the court if president trump were to name him just because he comes much more from a blue collar world than the sterling sort of privileged world of judge gorsuch. >> we will have coverage, of course, 8:00 p.m. eastern later tonight when the president is in the white house in the east room formally making this announcement. also our viewers some live pictures coming in from minneapolis, minnesota. there you see some live pictures. people protesting the travel ban imposed by the president. this is not milwaukee, this is minneapolis. others, other protests elsewhere around the country as well. we'll continue to watch all of this. up next, the president's top political strategist steve bannon. he's already a lightning rod for critics of the trump administration. is he the most powerful person in the white house?
2:46 pm
you're smart. you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car. you'll see what a fair price is, and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar. pain from a headache whecan make this...d, ...feel like this. all-in-one cold symptom relief from tylenol®,
2:47 pm
the #1 doctor recommended pain relief brand. tylenol® won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says you picked the wrong insurance plan. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, you won't have to worry about replacing your car because you'll get the full value back including depreciation. and if you have more than one liberty mutual policy, you qualify for a multi-policy discount, saving you money on your car and home coverage. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. and i finally found our big idaho potato truck. it's been touring the country telling folks about our heart healthy idaho potatoes, america's favorite potatoes, and donating to local charities along the way. but now it's finally back home where it belongs. aw man. hey, wait up. where you goin'?
2:48 pm
here we go again. if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare, serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio.
2:49 pm
entyvio. relief and remission within reach.
2:50 pm
white house strategist steve bannon the former boss of a right-wing website, may be the most influential voice in the president's ear right now. has he already put his stamp on the president's controversial early actions? what are you learning? >> there's little doubt the president's chief political strategist is one of the most powerful people in washington. cnn has learned stephen bannon was among those in donald trump's inner circle who pushed
2:51 pm
through key components of the president's travel ban. between those moves and bannon's position on the national security council, he's wielding influence like few presidential aides ever have. this story contains some graphic language. president trump's hardline approach on immigration and terror causing protests, disruptions at airports and now a messy fight with the justice department. the controversial moves have senior counselor stephen bannon's fingerprints all over them. tonight, there's new concern over bannon's massive influence over the president and his aggressive style. >> i think anger is a good thing. i think if you're fighting, this country's in a crisis. >> reporter: "the new york times" editorial page today says bannon positioned himself as, "the de facto president" and "we never witnessed a political aide do quite so much damage so quickly to his punitive boss' standing or pretenses of competence." analysts say bannon made a huge
2:52 pm
impact early in the administration getting himself a full seat on the national security council, leveraging the relationship he cultivated as the ceo of mr. trump's presidential campaign. >> bannon has been the most influential trump adviser in the first two weeks of this white house partly because he's got the president's ear and operates as this sort of free-floating adviser white the entanglements of other aisds. >> reporter: the 63-year-old former banker headed the far right breitbart news website and known for quotes like "darkness is good" and dick cheney, darth vader, satan, that's power." bannon now has the president'ser in a white house accused of a travel plan that discriminates against muslims which the white house denied. bannon, himself, has made some combative statements about islam. in 2014 -- >> we're now i believe at the beginning stages of a global war against islamic fascism. >> reporter: and in a 2010 radio interview discovered by cnn's
2:53 pm
k-file. >> islam is a religion of submission. >> reporter: bannon's call eed breitbart a platform for the far right. bannon denies being anti-semitic and a white nationalist but he isn't afraid to take on his own party. >> what we need to do is bitch slap the republican party. >> reporter: bannon has loyal defenders. >> steve bannon is national hero. we're going to see supreme court appointments of individuals who will uphold the constitution and for that, america owes steve bannon a great debt of gratitude. >> he understands and fights for the working class americans out there who haven't had their voices heard. >> reporter: kurt quit his job at breitbart and is not critical of bannon, he calls bannon dilige diligent, intelligent and intimidating. >> his governing style is very much that of force, a lot of what you saw in how trump reacted to controversy or criticism is reflective of steve's style, all about confrontation, being a provocateur, never backing down,
2:54 pm
never apologizing, never showing weakness and through sheer force of will, bully your agenda through, you know, by all means necessary. >> reporter: we asked for a response to that from the white house. they did not respond. stephen bannon did not comment for this story but a white house official swhen we asked for response about "the new york times'" editorial about bannon saying president trump might reduce bannon's role at the white house, that official told us "if "the new york times" editorial page actually mattered why did their candidate of choice lose the most electoral votes of any democratic candidate since michael dukakis?" wolf? >> any sense among those you've spoken to that the president will, in fact, reel in steve bannon? >> the analysts we spoke to, wolf, don't think he will. they point out bannon was usu crucial when many thought trump couldn't get elected. to president trump, that carries an enormous amount of weight. fru they point out trump is known for having people in favor and
2:55 pm
then fall out of favor. coming up, under fire from all sides. the white house defending its ban on travel from seven mostly muslim nations, and insisting it's not a ban even though the president and his press secretary used that word often. president trump will reveal his supreme court nominee in a primetime announcement. he's called his top two finalists to washington, sort of like a high-stakes version of "the apprentice." ets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor... t. rowe price. invest with confidence. parts a and b and want more coverage, guess what? you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window. no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything.
2:56 pm
and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. rates are competitive, and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long. [he has a new business teaching lessons. rodney wanted to know how his business was doing... ...so he got quickbooks. it organizes all his accounts, so he knows where he stands. ahhh...that's a profit. way to grow, rodney! visit quickbooks.com. c'mohappy birthday! i survived a heart attack. i'm doing all i can to
2:57 pm
keep from having another one. and i'm taking brilinta. for people who've been hospitalized for a heart attack. i take brilinta with a baby aspirin. no more than one hundred milligrams as it affects how well it works. brilinta helps keep my platelets from sticking together and forming a clot. brilinta reduced the chance of another heart attack. or dying from one. it worked better than plavix. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor since stopping it too soon increases your risk of clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. tell your doctor about bleeding, new or unexpected shortness of breath, any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. talk to your doctor about brilinta. i'm doing all i can. that includes brilinta. if you can't afford your medication, astra zeneca may be able to help. what if instead of waiting weeks for your tax refund? you can get an advance on that refund.
2:58 pm
[zombie] an advance on my tax refund, i could really use that. [john] what would you do with that money? [zombie] i'd love to take a tropical holiday. [john] i'd be careful, with your skin tone. [zombie] no i get it cause i'm a zombie. yeah that's funny. [off camera] all my undead, we are back. [john] i will see you out there. [zombie] see ya. [john] and don't take it personally. [vo] you can get a refund advance of up to $1250 no interest at block. [john] don't just get your taxes done. get your taxes won.
2:59 pm
zblnch zblnchsz . happening now, breaking news, the appointment, president trump is about to announce a decision that could impact this country for decades to come. we're getting new information
3:00 pm
about his supreme court pieffor to build suspense for the deal. dereliction of duty. the acting attorney general fired by president trump is accused of betrayal by the white house. will other administration officials who defy the president's travel ban face a similar fate? external threat. the european union chief suggests president trump and his immigration crackdown may pose a danger to the european continent. the trump administration now arguing there is no ban, even though the president, himself, used that word. and boycott. democrats take advantage of senate rules to stall committee votes on key cabinet nominees. members of minority party now searching for an effective strategy. do they have the power to trump the president? we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room."

20 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on